Birdwatch Note
2024-11-13 22:52:07 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Scott received 13 votes and 14 had endorsed him or claimed to have voted for him after the fact. There is no way to prove accuracy of statements due to it being a secret vote. Proposed note is therefore speculation. NNN
Written by B05F12E4450AD5F3855B521A302D70D9C433808A4D191F1CFD409C93EEE14640
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1856765692994785720
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1856832442998333626
- noteId - 1856832442998333626
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B05F12E4450AD5F3855B521A302D70D9C433808A4D191F1CFD409C93EEE14640 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1731538327346
- tweetId - 1856765692994785720
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Scott received 13 votes and 14 had endorsed him or claimed to have voted for him after the fact. There is no way to prove accuracy of statements due to it being a secret vote. Proposed note is therefore speculation. NNN
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-13 17:32:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 22:13:14 -0600 | Rating Details |