Birdwatch Note
2024-11-13 22:31:46 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. The IP used clear language that said it has been reported. OP did not claim the reporting was accurate, just stated that this is circulating.
Written by 3D29CDEA63E810E516663C07C6A94D47396EE9E013489C18AF8F76DC4177CCF3
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1856399334763602079
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1856827322210685374
- noteId - 1856827322210685374
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 3D29CDEA63E810E516663C07C6A94D47396EE9E013489C18AF8F76DC4177CCF3 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1731537106456
- tweetId - 1856399334763602079
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. The IP used clear language that said it has been reported. OP did not claim the reporting was accurate, just stated that this is circulating.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-13 17:26:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 16:39:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-16 21:03:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 16:47:06 -0600 | Rating Details |