Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-13 13:44:27 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Las imágenes corresponden a la ciudad de Badajoz y son antiguas. https://x.com/monspon11/status/1856678573899149698?s=61&t=aFvov32ZHUfabE62ROEliQ

Written by C0D47346EB83FC11DEF0D2CE0FEE010B192394C6B344BB35D33233368AFB33B6
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1856447834184188356

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1856694617283916167
  • noteId - 1856694617283916167
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C0D47346EB83FC11DEF0D2CE0FEE010B192394C6B344BB35D33233368AFB33B6 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1731505467136
  • tweetId - 1856447834184188356
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Las imágenes corresponden a la ciudad de Badajoz y son antiguas. https://x.com/monspon11/status/1856678573899149698?s=61&t=aFvov32ZHUfabE62ROEliQ

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-13 15:29:47 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-13 08:36:33 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-13 08:25:32 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-13 08:25:14 -0600 Rating Details