Birdwatch Note
2024-11-13 12:16:50 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
There’s no way to know the full amount spent at Wuhan, because those involved have been deceptive in responding to investigations. It’s almost assuredly much higher than the CN opposing this note implies. https://www.science.org/content/article/cia-bribed-its-own-covid-19-origin-team-reject-lab-leak-theory-anonymous-whistleblower
Written by 955E8A269842665A369434C1A2833A87CA2C615DEE930B7441A4A7CD2519DE11
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1856543882906943772
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1856672569111261647
- noteId - 1856672569111261647
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 955E8A269842665A369434C1A2833A87CA2C615DEE930B7441A4A7CD2519DE11 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1731500210442
- tweetId - 1856543882906943772
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There’s no way to know the full amount spent at Wuhan, because those involved have been deceptive in responding to investigations. It’s almost assuredly much higher than the CN opposing this note implies. https://www.science.org/content/article/cia-bribed-its-own-covid-19-origin-team-reject-lab-leak-theory-anonymous-whistleblower
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-13 17:06:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 16:33:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 13:32:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 12:30:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 11:54:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 11:28:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 11:22:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 10:49:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 10:01:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 09:49:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 09:02:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 07:49:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 07:23:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 20:40:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 18:06:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 16:30:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 15:03:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 13:59:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 09:20:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 08:14:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 07:02:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 06:49:59 -0600 | Rating Details |