Birdwatch Note
2024-11-13 08:37:53 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The article contains outdated data and debunked sources. It doesn't acknowledge Bitcoin's positive ESG impacts and sustainable energy use. New research shows that emissions are stable, peaked & reducing. Moving from PoW to PoS is a non-sequitur. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/blockchain/articles/10.3389/fbloc.2020.565497/full https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1062976922000473 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-019-0535-4 https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2313911121 https://kpmg.com/kpmg-us/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2024/bitcoins-role-esg-imperative.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.04578 https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/14/3/35 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c05445 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364032120308054 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096720923000441 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765523000313 https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/14/4/47 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061524001364 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266679242300015X https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b05687 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-32415-4_2
Written by E6FCDCE2849156DF5545C1472E209E9B7C66A7B5428BC41D57D918BF140AF3FB
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1855969366220718318
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1856617470561271838
- noteId - 1856617470561271838
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E6FCDCE2849156DF5545C1472E209E9B7C66A7B5428BC41D57D918BF140AF3FB Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1731487073923
- tweetId - 1855969366220718318
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The article contains outdated data and debunked sources. It doesn't acknowledge Bitcoin's positive ESG impacts and sustainable energy use. New research shows that emissions are stable, peaked & reducing. Moving from PoW to PoS is a non-sequitur. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/blockchain/articles/10.3389/fbloc.2020.565497/full https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1062976922000473 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-019-0535-4 https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2313911121 https://kpmg.com/kpmg-us/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2024/bitcoins-role-esg-imperative.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.04578 https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/14/3/35 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c05445 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364032120308054 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096720923000441 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765523000313 https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/14/4/47 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061524001364 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266679242300015X https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b05687 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-32415-4_2
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-13 07:16:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 02:51:44 -0600 | Rating Details |