Birdwatch Note
2024-11-12 11:19:09 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - while the note mentioning the parties' position is factually correct, it is irrelevant to the content of this post.
Written by 4E283D31529DE7EE687ED361015BBDAE14F77A0A0F0BCF54F6E2DE17EC06D1D5
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1856160180511379741
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1856295665695109141
- noteId - 1856295665695109141
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 4E283D31529DE7EE687ED361015BBDAE14F77A0A0F0BCF54F6E2DE17EC06D1D5 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1731410349664
- tweetId - 1856160180511379741
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - while the note mentioning the parties' position is factually correct, it is irrelevant to the content of this post.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-12 17:02:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-12 14:10:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 04:08:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 02:55:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-12 15:13:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-13 15:48:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-12 22:13:31 -0600 | Rating Details |