Birdwatch Note
2024-11-11 22:20:49 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Une correction d'un article scientifique ne peut pas être comptée comme un article scientifique. https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=fr&user=XUbRs6wAAAAJ&view_op=list_works&sortby=pubdate
Written by 6754891D631CCC94EB888675B4558BF18E3E6CD8D67F94BD525FC8222BC50B02
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1856099276914376736
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1856099792272642320
- noteId - 1856099792272642320
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 6754891D631CCC94EB888675B4558BF18E3E6CD8D67F94BD525FC8222BC50B02 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1731363649801
- tweetId - 1856099276914376736
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Une correction d'un article scientifique ne peut pas être comptée comme un article scientifique. https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=fr&user=XUbRs6wAAAAJ&view_op=list_works&sortby=pubdate
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-12 00:04:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 23:50:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 20:14:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 16:30:01 -0600 | Rating Details |