Birdwatch Note
2024-11-09 11:59:50 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
It was not. https://x.com/riotnbeck/status/1854927099594731992?s=46&t=zGqKM0Fb4_lqM5LPlpJYvw
Written by 5551147164C966CD83D2261FD35885C0DFDFC5C4715841B9EC3A683EC00846A2
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1854878967037047054
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1855218741635633185
- noteId - 1855218741635633185
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5551147164C966CD83D2261FD35885C0DFDFC5C4715841B9EC3A683EC00846A2 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1731153590960
- tweetId - 1854878967037047054
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- It was not. https://x.com/riotnbeck/status/1854927099594731992?s=46&t=zGqKM0Fb4_lqM5LPlpJYvw
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-09 10:44:24 -0600 | Rating Details |