Birdwatch Note
2024-11-08 10:01:14 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There is no substantial evidence to suggest that seed oils contribute to negative health outcomes when confounding factors are taken into account, e.g. calorie intake and balance, in human RCTs and MAs. On the contrary, the opposite is the scientific consensus. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831324001108 https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/12/11/2129 https://www.lipidjournal.com/article/S1933-2874(17)30513-5/abstract https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33611616/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31369090/
Written by 995586E7F5240683C8E1B3F40B8959C40DD2F0877BEACB4A4C0E776E83BBF820
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1854678107216921076
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1854826506062536862
- noteId - 1854826506062536862
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 995586E7F5240683C8E1B3F40B8959C40DD2F0877BEACB4A4C0E776E83BBF820 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1731060074712
- tweetId - 1854678107216921076
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There is no substantial evidence to suggest that seed oils contribute to negative health outcomes when confounding factors are taken into account, e.g. calorie intake and balance, in human RCTs and MAs. On the contrary, the opposite is the scientific consensus. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831324001108 https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/12/11/2129 https://www.lipidjournal.com/article/S1933-2874(17)30513-5/abstract https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33611616/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31369090/
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-08 18:05:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-08 12:05:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-08 10:22:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-08 10:07:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-08 08:20:43 -0600 | Rating Details |