Birdwatch Note
2024-11-07 06:48:31 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN, there’s no misleading claim or context that requires clarification. Since it’s clear it’s a prank, it doesn’tcause any harm or significant misunderstanding. CN’s guidance advises against adding notes unless content risks confusion or misinformation, which doesn’t apply here.
Written by E448768838CB5FAA586ADE4D3BF6526350A4B19D4B3CE74A974156329F0CA694
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1854351247207272696
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1854415616628900189
- noteId - 1854415616628900189
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E448768838CB5FAA586ADE4D3BF6526350A4B19D4B3CE74A974156329F0CA694 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1730962111037
- tweetId - 1854351247207272696
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN, there’s no misleading claim or context that requires clarification. Since it’s clear it’s a prank, it doesn’tcause any harm or significant misunderstanding. CN’s guidance advises against adding notes unless content risks confusion or misinformation, which doesn’t apply here.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-07 02:36:30 -0600 | Rating Details |