Birdwatch Note
2024-11-06 04:36:53 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Simply saying it's AI is not enough. Images can be AI and don't need to be labeled. Checklist 1. Prove that it's AI 2. Prove that they're claiming that it's real 3. Prove that there is a policy violation or some form of misleading
Written by 207EC1DE8B862CFA7C55AC2169709FC24836CBC8BDFD2BDB9860B4900ABB05ED
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1853034140750454889
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1854020105237123401
- noteId - 1854020105237123401
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 207EC1DE8B862CFA7C55AC2169709FC24836CBC8BDFD2BDB9860B4900ABB05ED Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1730867813773
- tweetId - 1853034140750454889
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Simply saying it's AI is not enough. Images can be AI and don't need to be labeled. Checklist 1. Prove that it's AI 2. Prove that they're claiming that it's real 3. Prove that there is a policy violation or some form of misleading
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-05 22:54:40 -0600 | Rating Details |