Birdwatch Note
2024-11-05 11:04:38 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. The tweet was accurate at the time it was written (even if not fully substantiated, it cites its source as a journalist likely to be in touch with credible sources). https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwy1vg400k5o
Written by 5B3FEAB56CDEAEEE5B59692F5CD80227D1718B4B75365C008DD8AF16239E9F11
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1853488233121816811
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1853755297975750687
- noteId - 1853755297975750687
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5B3FEAB56CDEAEEE5B59692F5CD80227D1718B4B75365C008DD8AF16239E9F11 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1730804678803
- tweetId - 1853488233121816811
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 1
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN. The tweet was accurate at the time it was written (even if not fully substantiated, it cites its source as a journalist likely to be in touch with credible sources). https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwy1vg400k5o
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-05 05:27:59 -0600 | Rating Details |