Birdwatch Note
2024-11-04 08:30:17 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN Obama had a Democratic supermajority in 2009. The nerds are trying to point out that not every Democrat wanted to codify Roe then, but that’s not the point. The point is that they could have tried to whip the vote like Republicans do. It’s commenting on his broken promises https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/111th_United_States_Congress
Written by 69FF68E8D1F44F5B89BDFEB705DBBE771DEEEA20A172514BFFF25C168DE6AE78
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1853181474133995937
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1853354064782004701
- noteId - 1853354064782004701
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 69FF68E8D1F44F5B89BDFEB705DBBE771DEEEA20A172514BFFF25C168DE6AE78 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1730709017354
- tweetId - 1853181474133995937
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN Obama had a Democratic supermajority in 2009. The nerds are trying to point out that not every Democrat wanted to codify Roe then, but that’s not the point. The point is that they could have tried to whip the vote like Republicans do. It’s commenting on his broken promises https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/111th_United_States_Congress
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-11-04 18:39:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 15:43:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 15:13:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 15:03:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 14:38:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 14:12:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 13:46:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 13:16:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 13:10:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 13:07:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 13:05:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 12:58:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 12:53:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 12:35:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 12:35:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 12:28:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 12:25:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 12:13:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 11:49:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 11:32:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 10:17:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 09:12:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 09:10:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 08:49:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 08:48:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 08:30:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 08:16:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 08:10:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 08:07:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 07:57:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 07:54:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 07:51:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 07:22:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 04:30:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 04:15:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 03:36:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 03:25:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-04 02:58:03 -0600 | Rating Details |