Birdwatch Note
2024-11-04 02:27:56 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
天然痘の撲滅は接種と密接に関連していた事が知られています。 これはファクトチェック記事でもそう確認されていますし https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/01/12/fact-check-vaccination-helped-eliminate-smallpox/4124284001/ WHOも https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/history-of-vaccination/history-of-smallpox-vaccination 感染研もそうした見解で https://www.niid.go.jp/niid/ja/kansennohanashi/445-smallpox-intro.html それらが覆された事はありません。 よく天然痘の激減がワクチンと関係ないとして挙げられる英国のミームも実際は一流誌の論文で接種政策の推進と密接に関係した事が報告済です。 https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000506.g006 投稿図の簡単な問題は本当の予防接種導入前との比較をしてないというものです 例えば一番左上のボストンの例ですと、原始的な人痘の１７００年第前半の導入前は流行年には10万人あたり数千人が死亡していました(下記がその経緯解説です) https://web.archive.org/web/20240105015359/https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/special-edition-on-infectious-disease/2014/the-fight-over-inoculation-during-the-1721-boston-smallpox-epidemic/
Written by F4D2E4CA66E08B99BDDE8328BBF4C2313B853B3595C8AC38600E463328C72D9D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1853087812264067114
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1853262875286204520
- noteId - 1853262875286204520
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F4D2E4CA66E08B99BDDE8328BBF4C2313B853B3595C8AC38600E463328C72D9D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1730687276085
- tweetId - 1853087812264067114
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 1
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- 天然痘の撲滅は接種と密接に関連していた事が知られています。 これはファクトチェック記事でもそう確認されていますし https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/01/12/fact-check-vaccination-helped-eliminate-smallpox/4124284001/ WHOも https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/history-of-vaccination/history-of-smallpox-vaccination 感染研もそうした見解で https://www.niid.go.jp/niid/ja/kansennohanashi/445-smallpox-intro.html それらが覆された事はありません。 よく天然痘の激減がワクチンと関係ないとして挙げられる英国のミームも実際は一流誌の論文で接種政策の推進と密接に関係した事が報告済です。 https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000506.g006 投稿図の簡単な問題は本当の予防接種導入前との比較をしてないというものです 例えば一番左上のボストンの例ですと、原始的な人痘の１７００年第前半の導入前は流行年には10万人あたり数千人が死亡していました(下記がその経緯解説です) https://web.archive.org/web/20240105015359/https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/special-edition-on-infectious-disease/2014/the-fight-over-inoculation-during-the-1721-boston-smallpox-epidemic/
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-04 14:09:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 07:45:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 06:41:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 05:03:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 02:08:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 00:44:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 23:52:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 23:52:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 23:20:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 22:59:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 22:51:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 22:36:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 22:35:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 22:15:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 22:12:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 21:34:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 21:28:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 21:26:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 21:02:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 20:59:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 20:59:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 20:58:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 20:55:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 20:49:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 20:37:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-05 18:47:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 15:15:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 11:47:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 00:25:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 23:55:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 21:30:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 21:18:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 20:53:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 17:50:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 11:05:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 08:32:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 03:52:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 03:48:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 02:44:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 01:21:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 23:00:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 22:21:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 22:11:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 22:00:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 21:21:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 21:04:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 20:53:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 18:53:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 03:11:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 01:17:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 00:20:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 23:38:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 23:31:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 22:19:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 21:17:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 20:58:36 -0600 | Rating Details |