Birdwatch Note
2024-11-04 00:43:34 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. The CN seems to have a problem with the user’s name? That literally doesn’t matter especially since they aren’t impersonating or misrepresenting anything.
Written by D70CC5ABBE0DC8A940241D4517B4425A1B63C7A48A3C3414B2566FF2F1B9FDB7
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1853201037097947303
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1853236611708039466
- noteId - 1853236611708039466
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D70CC5ABBE0DC8A940241D4517B4425A1B63C7A48A3C3414B2566FF2F1B9FDB7 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1730681014359
- tweetId - 1853201037097947303
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. The CN seems to have a problem with the user’s name? That literally doesn’t matter especially since they aren’t impersonating or misrepresenting anything.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-03 20:01:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-03 19:08:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 09:26:21 -0600 | Rating Details |