Birdwatch Note
2024-11-03 23:57:53 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The post is not misleading or false in any way, because it is only the exact quote by Trump during the interview. On the other hand, to disqualify the post as being an unjust proof of a threat towards Cheney, merely because you don't like the sender, is very misleading. https://t.co/4Sbx3fFr24
Written by 96269550FB4F9021B7257C5D7BF573004C080BD13AB3FCDE1189F49DFD199C4E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1852231940402753610
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1853225116706001390
- noteId - 1853225116706001390
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 96269550FB4F9021B7257C5D7BF573004C080BD13AB3FCDE1189F49DFD199C4E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1730678273737
- tweetId - 1852231940402753610
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The post is not misleading or false in any way, because it is only the exact quote by Trump during the interview. On the other hand, to disqualify the post as being an unjust proof of a threat towards Cheney, merely because you don't like the sender, is very misleading. https://t.co/4Sbx3fFr24
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-03 18:37:41 -0600 | Rating Details |