Birdwatch Note
2024-11-03 14:57:28 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Take a hint CN abusers. X doesn't consider a watermark to be an ad, and neither does anyone else.
Written by 89D719979BB6E49BC5E3D51541AC2D606BE5A05A5F4EDF451E5AC264F96EB601
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1853068402442613175
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1853089116222636078
- noteId - 1853089116222636078
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 89D719979BB6E49BC5E3D51541AC2D606BE5A05A5F4EDF451E5AC264F96EB601 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1730645848695
- tweetId - 1853068402442613175
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Take a hint CN abusers. X doesn't consider a watermark to be an ad, and neither does anyone else.
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-11-03 14:08:07 -0600 | Rating Details |