Birdwatch Note
2024-11-01 17:08:14 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
“Protecting women” whether they want it or not; that’s not freedom. It shows disrespect & disregard for women (which is the point).
Written by 0E8423C9928EA53ACF25EFF2A8810CE6A49EAC6A16FC3DAE455D68DC3E2AC8ED
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1852151480746172515
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1852397248644297040
- noteId - 1852397248644297040
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0E8423C9928EA53ACF25EFF2A8810CE6A49EAC6A16FC3DAE455D68DC3E2AC8ED Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1730480894610
- tweetId - 1852151480746172515
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- “Protecting women” whether they want it or not; that’s not freedom. It shows disrespect & disregard for women (which is the point).
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-01 15:44:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-01 13:55:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-01 14:15:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-01 13:12:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-01 14:22:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-01 14:13:19 -0500 | Rating Details |