Birdwatch Note
2024-10-30 08:51:50 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. Yes, raising a cap doesn't equate directly to a tax but this is a rhetoric device. Removing a subsidy is functionally equivalent to raising a tax.
Written by E764BDF09962F1ABD92749FDEB329E6BD037C08FD55DD6458DD2F1F8FA36FA1D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1851336206543429703
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1851547550676856879
- noteId - 1851547550676856879
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E764BDF09962F1ABD92749FDEB329E6BD037C08FD55DD6458DD2F1F8FA36FA1D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1730278310828
- tweetId - 1851336206543429703
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. Yes, raising a cap doesn't equate directly to a tax but this is a rhetoric device. Removing a subsidy is functionally equivalent to raising a tax.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-31 09:18:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-31 03:00:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-31 07:50:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-11 21:13:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-30 04:47:25 -0500 | Rating Details |