Birdwatch Note
2024-10-30 06:47:43 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The "context" in the current CN should have been a comment underneath (or a quote over) the post. NNN.
Written by 53BD241431CAA9AE46E3408F03B283949D3BC6C4D5A5520A3C51FC3B40539900
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1850891155531035098
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1851516316059902251
- noteId - 1851516316059902251
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 53BD241431CAA9AE46E3408F03B283949D3BC6C4D5A5520A3C51FC3B40539900 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1730270863915
- tweetId - 1850891155531035098
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The "context" in the current CN should have been a comment underneath (or a quote over) the post. NNN.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-30 14:40:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-30 09:41:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-30 13:02:49 -0500 | Rating Details |