Birdwatch Note
2024-10-30 01:56:31 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN What opponents call it doesn't matter. It is factually correct to say the said directive was NOT a muslim ban. For it to be a muslim ban it would need to have banned all muslims from around the world. Stop abusing the CN
Written by D7EB030140D06FA90565DF130E6FA9651E891FBECFB6B1A5F14C57DF072CE76F
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1851226486939820202
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1851443032287314177
- noteId - 1851443032287314177
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D7EB030140D06FA90565DF130E6FA9651E891FBECFB6B1A5F14C57DF072CE76F Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1730253391702
- tweetId - 1851226486939820202
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN What opponents call it doesn't matter. It is factually correct to say the said directive was NOT a muslim ban. For it to be a muslim ban it would need to have banned all muslims from around the world. Stop abusing the CN
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-03 18:57:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-29 20:59:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-29 22:05:06 -0500 | Rating Details |