Birdwatch Note
2024-10-29 20:44:05 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There is no evidence Tim walz posted this https://x.com/tim_walz?s=21.
Written by 354E553ED7ABE993E489AA89975B400CC0D3130D323E31593F07A12E29407280
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1850864208868438098
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1851364404232638582
- noteId - 1851364404232638582
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 354E553ED7ABE993E489AA89975B400CC0D3130D323E31593F07A12E29407280 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1730234645313
- tweetId - 1850864208868438098
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 1
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There is no evidence Tim walz posted this https://x.com/tim_walz?s=21.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-29 15:50:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-29 19:24:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-29 17:32:35 -0500 | Rating Details |