Birdwatch Note
2024-10-28 05:18:06 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
No you don't need to explain. We need a option on here to vote contributors off CN who keep adding notes that aren't needed & waste everyone's time.
Written by 0B433E72D2F4EBF7F4E403AC9DADA4E7A912488259581241892B8ED451F6C25A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1724835068668174585
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1850768987371741596
- noteId - 1850768987371741596
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0B433E72D2F4EBF7F4E403AC9DADA4E7A912488259581241892B8ED451F6C25A Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1730092686871
- tweetId - 1724835068668174585
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- No you don't need to explain. We need a option on here to vote contributors off CN who keep adding notes that aren't needed & waste everyone's time.