Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-26 15:56:51 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Nnn, para desmentir algo se debe probar. No porque la acusada diga que es mentira, se debe tomar como valida su declaraciĆ³n

Written by B0749508559FB85852FA258803157DCE277F00EDD8C00A7AC601044A4B770310
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1849913969827328445

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1850204956088762722
  • noteId - 1850204956088762722
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - B0749508559FB85852FA258803157DCE277F00EDD8C00A7AC601044A4B770310 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1729958211334
  • tweetId - 1849913969827328445
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • Nnn, para desmentir algo se debe probar. No porque la acusada diga que es mentira, se debe tomar como valida su declaraciĆ³n

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-10-26 16:56:37 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-26 14:05:40 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-26 11:34:10 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-26 11:03:07 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-27 02:51:18 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-26 16:02:30 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-26 11:41:31 -0500 Rating Details