Birdwatch Note
2024-10-26 15:56:51 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Nnn, para desmentir algo se debe probar. No porque la acusada diga que es mentira, se debe tomar como valida su declaraciĆ³n
Written by B0749508559FB85852FA258803157DCE277F00EDD8C00A7AC601044A4B770310
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1849913969827328445
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1850204956088762722
- noteId - 1850204956088762722
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B0749508559FB85852FA258803157DCE277F00EDD8C00A7AC601044A4B770310 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729958211334
- tweetId - 1849913969827328445
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Nnn, para desmentir algo se debe probar. No porque la acusada diga que es mentira, se debe tomar como valida su declaraciĆ³n
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-10-26 16:56:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-26 14:05:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-26 11:34:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-26 11:03:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-27 02:51:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-26 16:02:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-26 11:41:31 -0500 | Rating Details |