Birdwatch Note
2024-10-25 21:14:40 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN Sacks aren’t tracked in stats when they come from a free rusher, which was the case in both sacks here
Written by 315CBA6DB6BAF0427E409AC94EE81BCD5760F775EB669AB97E2506F8A55E872A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1849105247572304303
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1849922550492434626
- noteId - 1849922550492434626
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 315CBA6DB6BAF0427E409AC94EE81BCD5760F775EB669AB97E2506F8A55E872A Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729890880594
- tweetId - 1849105247572304303
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN Sacks aren’t tracked in stats when they come from a free rusher, which was the case in both sacks here
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-26 23:36:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 20:26:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-26 07:23:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 23:43:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 22:22:39 -0500 | Rating Details |