Birdwatch Note
2024-10-25 21:12:19 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Die Version des Algos auf GitHub ist veraltet und außerdem laut Experten unvollständig https://github.com/igorbrigadir/awesome-twitter-algo
Written by 3956048DE4C27D3A264C4DE83C6620D3FFAAF93C85393DCAE8D2E366313DE46B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1849758390999806235
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1849921957480788436
- noteId - 1849921957480788436
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 3956048DE4C27D3A264C4DE83C6620D3FFAAF93C85393DCAE8D2E366313DE46B Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729890739208
- tweetId - 1849758390999806235
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Die Version des Algos auf GitHub ist veraltet und außerdem laut Experten unvollständig https://github.com/igorbrigadir/awesome-twitter-algo
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-27 03:53:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-26 00:55:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 16:35:57 -0500 | Rating Details |