Birdwatch Note
2024-10-25 21:01:22 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Nope.No we don’t.
Written by F6E935340B6D4D4779251FB455DDF4F0FBC25E4813A7BC36EAE970471AF21F8D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1849757139729793204
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1849919201613365560
- noteId - 1849919201613365560
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F6E935340B6D4D4779251FB455DDF4F0FBC25E4813A7BC36EAE970471AF21F8D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729890082159
- tweetId - 1849757139729793204
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 1
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Nope.No we don’t.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-25 22:35:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 23:54:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 22:48:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-26 00:22:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 20:23:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-26 09:07:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-26 07:51:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 22:43:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 22:05:40 -0500 | Rating Details |