Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-25 05:47:42 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN, op wasn't claiming it's safe to eat. op was stating that the ingredients are better, proven by the molding. op worded their post poorly

Written by B1013099BDBBCA1A8B8C5FBB07B2391682AC3444EACB04EB9335483B71FD6F63
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1849254105534833077

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1849689271042461899
  • noteId - 1849689271042461899
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - B1013099BDBBCA1A8B8C5FBB07B2391682AC3444EACB04EB9335483B71FD6F63 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1729835262439
  • tweetId - 1849254105534833077
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN, op wasn't claiming it's safe to eat. op was stating that the ingredients are better, proven by the molding. op worded their post poorly