Birdwatch Note
2024-10-25 01:01:50 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
According to Zechariah Chafee, widely regarded as "the most influential" First Amendment scholar in U.S. history, the purpose of the First Amendment was "to outlaw the law of seditious libel" from England. It had nothing to do with race or Marxist conceptions of oppression. https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2307&context=lawreview
Written by 1E3537D85C6D2873E14A352B7126BF38F9501C2CA0ADC2DFBED1A641AF6D632F
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1849134425776243025
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1849617328826200170
- noteId - 1849617328826200170
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 1E3537D85C6D2873E14A352B7126BF38F9501C2CA0ADC2DFBED1A641AF6D632F Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729818110077
- tweetId - 1849134425776243025
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- According to Zechariah Chafee, widely regarded as "the most influential" First Amendment scholar in U.S. history, the purpose of the First Amendment was "to outlaw the law of seditious libel" from England. It had nothing to do with race or Marxist conceptions of oppression. https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2307&context=lawreview
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-26 05:26:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 08:22:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-24 23:39:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-24 21:41:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-27 19:33:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-26 03:35:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 16:52:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 08:18:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-24 20:07:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-05 09:43:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-28 22:39:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-27 09:36:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-27 04:48:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-26 22:10:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 12:53:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 09:06:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 00:22:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 16:04:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 10:30:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 06:46:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 00:16:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-29 07:25:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-28 09:05:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-28 03:33:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-27 22:41:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 11:32:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 08:23:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 08:21:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-25 01:27:31 -0500 | Rating Details |