Birdwatch Note
2024-10-24 16:29:35 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
I’ve never before seen a community note that is just the original post but reworded. The most useless one yet.
Written by 37EBD378CA432AF2091C737C523E97730CE90DD6D0821B6AC1997DFC0570A242
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1849454592003547507
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1849488418926956610
- noteId - 1849488418926956610
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 37EBD378CA432AF2091C737C523E97730CE90DD6D0821B6AC1997DFC0570A242 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729787375562
- tweetId - 1849454592003547507
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- I’ve never before seen a community note that is just the original post but reworded. The most useless one yet.
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-10-24 12:46:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-25 01:53:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-24 12:22:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-24 11:51:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-25 07:51:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-24 15:09:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-24 12:19:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-24 23:01:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-24 12:28:24 -0500 | Rating Details |