Birdwatch Note
2024-10-23 12:17:41 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
It is pseudo science https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0161475411000686 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0161475415001840
Written by 15310F2A737F87561DAC16D0274A50D68CA0D0E90F00451219EF2AB3F7A0A46F
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1848955928046940256
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1849062637314674903
- noteId - 1849062637314674903
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 15310F2A737F87561DAC16D0274A50D68CA0D0E90F00451219EF2AB3F7A0A46F Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729685861315
- tweetId - 1848955928046940256
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- It is pseudo science https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0161475411000686 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0161475415001840