Birdwatch Note
2024-10-23 04:41:34 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Factually correct, post your opinion in the comments not CN. Also “Reuters.com” is not a reputable source.
Written by BCE30BA8BFAEBEEAB9F94D1C625A94389E732A17CBD2699776057072158D885E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1848492012619669577
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1848947854246547663
- noteId - 1848947854246547663
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - BCE30BA8BFAEBEEAB9F94D1C625A94389E732A17CBD2699776057072158D885E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729658494899
- tweetId - 1848492012619669577
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Factually correct, post your opinion in the comments not CN. Also “Reuters.com” is not a reputable source.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-23 02:26:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-23 17:26:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-23 14:46:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 23:52:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-23 04:19:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-23 00:03:27 -0500 | Rating Details |