Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-23 02:15:07 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

This person makes no claims about who sent the message in their screenshot, so a note saying "this was sent by someone other than the official campaign" isn't needed here.

Written by CDA28A1582500CC232315541E8D039F6647ECF2BD1417C53F7211450320CC081
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1848526262710768121

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1848910998360445171
  • noteId - 1848910998360445171
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - CDA28A1582500CC232315541E8D039F6647ECF2BD1417C53F7211450320CC081 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1729649707771
  • tweetId - 1848526262710768121
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This person makes no claims about who sent the message in their screenshot, so a note saying "this was sent by someone other than the official campaign" isn't needed here.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-10-22 21:33:59 -0500 Rating Details