Birdwatch Note
2024-10-22 04:43:39 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Proposed note belongs on the quoted Tweet. The video in question being false doesn't refute this Tweet in any way.
Written by FA785F3A10CF12A3208EB059EC159C9C539F62973E2CBEF825E8EABC2DFB0B16
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1847949731923706118
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1848585989389701602
- noteId - 1848585989389701602
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - FA785F3A10CF12A3208EB059EC159C9C539F62973E2CBEF825E8EABC2DFB0B16 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729572219594
- tweetId - 1847949731923706118
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Proposed note belongs on the quoted Tweet. The video in question being false doesn't refute this Tweet in any way.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-22 01:39:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 04:13:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 00:06:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 23:48:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 04:24:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 03:23:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 00:43:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 00:29:46 -0500 | Rating Details |