Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-22 03:14:16 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

A federal jury found Steve Bannon guilty of unlawfully defying a subpoena issued by the January 6th Committee. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Bannon#2022_contempt_of_Congress_conviction_and_prison_stay:~:text=On%20July%2022%2C%202022%2C%20the%20jury%20found%20Bannon%20guilty%20on%20both%20charges https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress#:~:text=Found%20guilty%20by%20a%20Federal%20Jury%20of%20unlawfully%20defying%20a%20subpoena%20issued%20by%20the%20January%206th%20Committee https://www.npr.org/2024/05/10/1250504958/steve-bannon-contempt-upheld https://apnews.com/article/steve-bannon-contempt-congress-appeals-court-397cd470d2862816fea776b0d788a760 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/730 https://levin-center.org/bannon-contempt-of-congress-indictment/ https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/r/r45653 The subpoena met the requirements of Wilkinson v. United States (1961) and is thus "legally sufficient" and enforceable. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress#:~:text=a%20congressional%20committee%20must,been%20authorized%20for%20investigation https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/365/399/#:~:text=If%20these%2C%20then,and%20free%20speech https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/106181/wilkinson-v-united-states/#:~:text=If%20these%2C%20then,and%20free%20speech https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1998845357020858365#:~:text=If%20these%2C%20then,and%20free%20speech https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilkinson_v._United_States

Written by AE2BFC408A40E844D958518E3823636E7C856D5F6CEE6CFBC099BBA9FC35474A
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1848475123990380603

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1848563494485926112
  • noteId - 1848563494485926112
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - AE2BFC408A40E844D958518E3823636E7C856D5F6CEE6CFBC099BBA9FC35474A Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1729566856391
  • tweetId - 1848475123990380603
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • A federal jury found Steve Bannon guilty of unlawfully defying a subpoena issued by the January 6th Committee. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Bannon#2022_contempt_of_Congress_conviction_and_prison_stay:~:text=On%20July%2022%2C%202022%2C%20the%20jury%20found%20Bannon%20guilty%20on%20both%20charges https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress#:~:text=Found%20guilty%20by%20a%20Federal%20Jury%20of%20unlawfully%20defying%20a%20subpoena%20issued%20by%20the%20January%206th%20Committee https://www.npr.org/2024/05/10/1250504958/steve-bannon-contempt-upheld https://apnews.com/article/steve-bannon-contempt-congress-appeals-court-397cd470d2862816fea776b0d788a760 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/730 https://levin-center.org/bannon-contempt-of-congress-indictment/ https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/r/r45653 The subpoena met the requirements of Wilkinson v. United States (1961) and is thus "legally sufficient" and enforceable. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress#:~:text=a%20congressional%20committee%20must,been%20authorized%20for%20investigation https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/365/399/#:~:text=If%20these%2C%20then,and%20free%20speech https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/106181/wilkinson-v-united-states/#:~:text=If%20these%2C%20then,and%20free%20speech https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1998845357020858365#:~:text=If%20these%2C%20then,and%20free%20speech https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilkinson_v._United_States

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-10-23 14:05:20 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-22 20:25:07 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-22 08:36:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-21 23:47:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-21 23:03:58 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-21 23:00:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-22 09:08:20 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-21 22:24:29 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-22 16:28:34 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-22 08:14:14 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-22 01:13:50 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-21 22:29:56 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-23 12:55:08 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-22 17:05:39 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-22 18:24:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-22 17:39:16 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-22 08:08:24 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-21 23:20:51 -0500 Rating Details