Birdwatch Note
2024-10-22 01:00:50 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN, mucho menos sin fuentes que demuestren todo lo escrito en el post es falso, o aunque sea parcialmente. Para opiniones existe la funcion de responder.
Written by 0281A3E88C3C226058BEE76E1CF5061FC8A6D553ACEA0BF7ED8BD4D1CBA8E939
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1848402382213837196
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1848529916486123836
- noteId - 1848529916486123836
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0281A3E88C3C226058BEE76E1CF5061FC8A6D553ACEA0BF7ED8BD4D1CBA8E939 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729558850772
- tweetId - 1848402382213837196
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN, mucho menos sin fuentes que demuestren todo lo escrito en el post es falso, o aunque sea parcialmente. Para opiniones existe la funcion de responder.
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-10-22 10:04:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-22 08:02:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-22 07:42:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-22 01:02:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-22 08:49:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-21 21:38:15 -0500 | Rating Details |