Birdwatch Note
2024-10-22 00:49:40 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Table S5 of this article shows the following: https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMc2202092/suppl_file/nejmc2202092_appendix.pdf Age, but not vaccination status, has a significant effect in the univariable model. In the multivariable model (where age is adjusted), the hazard ratio for booster status is 1.01 (95%CI:0.43-2.33), indicating nearly no difference.
Written by F4D2E4CA66E08B99BDDE8328BBF4C2313B853B3595C8AC38600E463328C72D9D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1848454267675545968
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1848527103983268220
- noteId - 1848527103983268220
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F4D2E4CA66E08B99BDDE8328BBF4C2313B853B3595C8AC38600E463328C72D9D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729558180219
- tweetId - 1848454267675545968
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 1
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Table S5 of this article shows the following: https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMc2202092/suppl_file/nejmc2202092_appendix.pdf Age, but not vaccination status, has a significant effect in the univariable model. In the multivariable model (where age is adjusted), the hazard ratio for booster status is 1.01 (95%CI:0.43-2.33), indicating nearly no difference.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-22 08:53:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 04:25:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 03:24:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 02:57:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 22:27:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 21:47:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 10:47:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 04:07:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 03:35:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 21:52:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 01:42:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 18:04:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 08:46:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 23:41:41 -0500 | Rating Details |