Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-21 21:26:45 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN Was Bojanowski mit "anderes" meint, bleibt offen. Tatsächlich zeigt die neue Studie anderes als die gut belegte Statistik von "Our World in Data". https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-024-02140-w

Written by 0C53F6F988ECE90641597FBF0940169CCD31FFE85F540F2DFA23A67212629D1E
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1848437086208110951

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1848476039661687063
  • noteId - 1848476039661687063
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 0C53F6F988ECE90641597FBF0940169CCD31FFE85F540F2DFA23A67212629D1E Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1729546005537
  • tweetId - 1848437086208110951
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN Was Bojanowski mit "anderes" meint, bleibt offen. Tatsächlich zeigt die neue Studie anderes als die gut belegte Statistik von "Our World in Data". https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-024-02140-w