Birdwatch Note
2024-10-21 21:08:05 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN, OP said there were rumors. Rumors are defined as “talk with no discernible source” https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rumor
Written by 1D46D23F9554EA53EB87F490FE78413E89B7AD89F34166FCC6FC6D502A785DB1
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1848400599496159606
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1848471341151723920
- noteId - 1848471341151723920
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 1D46D23F9554EA53EB87F490FE78413E89B7AD89F34166FCC6FC6D502A785DB1 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729544885324
- tweetId - 1848400599496159606
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN, OP said there were rumors. Rumors are defined as “talk with no discernible source” https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rumor
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-23 04:49:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 12:58:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 10:44:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 08:55:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-22 01:23:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 16:32:26 -0500 | Rating Details |