Birdwatch Note
2024-10-21 20:14:03 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN— Those CN contributors who want to argue their legal bona fides with the OP in the comments are welcome to. The OP is a legal expert, and is expressing how he interprets and would argue the law. If you disagree, there is a vehicle for that, called a “reply.” Notes isn’t it.
Written by 2B0FE9787247C68AD1041F06B0F1B6056ECA6DB2638E6D746D8205F8FA1AD5C5
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1847810939724198007
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1848457745491730700
- noteId - 1848457745491730700
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 2B0FE9787247C68AD1041F06B0F1B6056ECA6DB2638E6D746D8205F8FA1AD5C5 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729541643867
- tweetId - 1847810939724198007
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN— Those CN contributors who want to argue their legal bona fides with the OP in the comments are welcome to. The OP is a legal expert, and is expressing how he interprets and would argue the law. If you disagree, there is a vehicle for that, called a “reply.” Notes isn’t it.
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-10-22 12:43:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-21 17:40:56 -0500 | Rating Details |