Birdwatch Note
2024-10-21 11:09:23 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
You did not explain anything in your note. Sources aren't an explanation. They are meant to support your added context or rebuttal. It's on you to explain why you think those sources warrant a CN
Written by 873C2EBCBD692980CEF10A13118BD745F2E7B5BE75763501E5BD55EADFB9A591
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1847698759322325194
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1848320675364409755
- noteId - 1848320675364409755
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 873C2EBCBD692980CEF10A13118BD745F2E7B5BE75763501E5BD55EADFB9A591 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729508963801
- tweetId - 1847698759322325194
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- You did not explain anything in your note. Sources aren't an explanation. They are meant to support your added context or rebuttal. It's on you to explain why you think those sources warrant a CN
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-24 03:04:36 -0500 | Rating Details |