Birdwatch Note
2024-10-21 07:03:45 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The linked source in the proposed CN doesn't claim that the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis is totally debunked: "So does language change how we see the world? Yes and no" Besides, Devon nuanced his stance sufficiently that even if the hypothesis is false, his point stands. NNN
Written by 17A5CE313F204316715565299C196C70C46DF67DBD030BF3AFF20DEA902EC9F1
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1847706916186968332
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1848258859602678107
- noteId - 1848258859602678107
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 17A5CE313F204316715565299C196C70C46DF67DBD030BF3AFF20DEA902EC9F1 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729494225775
- tweetId - 1847706916186968332
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The linked source in the proposed CN doesn't claim that the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis is totally debunked: "So does language change how we see the world? Yes and no" Besides, Devon nuanced his stance sufficiently that even if the hypothesis is false, his point stands. NNN
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-25 10:19:05 -0500 | Rating Details |