Birdwatch Note
2024-10-20 14:39:16 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
報道にある「子ども・子育て支援金制度」は婚姻状態や子供の有無による負担の差異はありません。 そのため支援金負担の「独身税」という記載するのは誤りです https://www.jiji.com/sp/article?k=2024040900516&g=eco
Written by FAA6512F46650AC7A508442D795D78E5E9AE1010ABCB979CFF14766A4C6E9312
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1847554756514107878
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1848011104490070472
- noteId - 1848011104490070472
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - FAA6512F46650AC7A508442D795D78E5E9AE1010ABCB979CFF14766A4C6E9312 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729435156353
- tweetId - 1847554756514107878
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- 報道にある「子ども・子育て支援金制度」は婚姻状態や子供の有無による負担の差異はありません。 そのため支援金負担の「独身税」という記載するのは誤りです https://www.jiji.com/sp/article?k=2024040900516&g=eco
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-24 23:08:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 19:02:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-20 19:52:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-20 21:41:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-23 05:06:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-20 09:43:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 17:14:46 -0500 | Rating Details |