Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-19 13:14:22 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Labor economists would not classify these positions as skilled labor as they lack the education or technical proficiency that typically defines skilled labor. Worth noting as an abuse of technical jargon. These positions would not count in immigration law, for example: https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-6-part-f-chapter-7 https://www.thestreet.com/dictionary/skilled-labor-skilled-workers#:~:text=Skilled%20labor%20is%20an%20umbrella,specific%20educational%20or%20experiential%20requisites.

Written by C54CDC2006A37C35B96C4E9961822EB3A704F75F5C3C0CC68586E35AEDA2F52C
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1847627350663712886
• noteId - 1847627350663712886
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - C54CDC2006A37C35B96C4E9961822EB3A704F75F5C3C0CC68586E35AEDA2F52C Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1729343662312
• tweetId - 1846940387123888525
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 1
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• Labor economists would not classify these positions as skilled labor as they lack the education or technical proficiency that typically defines skilled labor. Worth noting as an abuse of technical jargon. These positions would not count in immigration law, for example: https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-6-part-f-chapter-7 https://www.thestreet.com/dictionary/skilled-labor-skilled-workers#:~:text=Skilled%20labor%20is%20an%20umbrella,specific%20educational%20or%20experiential%20requisites.