Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-18 18:00:08 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

In context the conversation is about the revisionist history 1619 project. Written as fiction and promoted as historical education to schools the 1619 project is controversial for inciting racial tension for purpose of provocation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_1619_Project

Written by F0F008AD2E870ABC745AF920ABBE232173603BBDBFEC1E2CC1D9967E7B643808
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1847272711808045133

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1847336879945076748
  • noteId - 1847336879945076748
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F0F008AD2E870ABC745AF920ABBE232173603BBDBFEC1E2CC1D9967E7B643808 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1729274408695
  • tweetId - 1847272711808045133
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • In context the conversation is about the revisionist history 1619 project. Written as fiction and promoted as historical education to schools the 1619 project is controversial for inciting racial tension for purpose of provocation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_1619_Project