Birdwatch Note
2024-10-18 11:59:36 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN -- First, this tweet isn't offering a citation, they are stating a broad belief. Second, the regulatory body referred to in the proposed CN is a federal agency, with leadership appointed by the Executive Branch. It is appropriate to consider that when voting for POTUS.
Written by 2B0FE9787247C68AD1041F06B0F1B6056ECA6DB2638E6D746D8205F8FA1AD5C5
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1846885818599666169
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1847246149557617120
- noteId - 1847246149557617120
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 2B0FE9787247C68AD1041F06B0F1B6056ECA6DB2638E6D746D8205F8FA1AD5C5 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729252776886
- tweetId - 1846885818599666169
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN -- First, this tweet isn't offering a citation, they are stating a broad belief. Second, the regulatory body referred to in the proposed CN is a federal agency, with leadership appointed by the Executive Branch. It is appropriate to consider that when voting for POTUS.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-18 07:54:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-18 07:45:21 -0500 | Rating Details |