Birdwatch Note
2024-10-17 16:46:43 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN, it seems very likely that this is indeed Sinwar.
Written by 9AEE72AE7A9DC1CB67F507DB08EC742F786CCA252694405509E8DF0BC22FB720
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1846920335179870556
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1846956015985873224
- noteId - 1846956015985873224
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 9AEE72AE7A9DC1CB67F507DB08EC742F786CCA252694405509E8DF0BC22FB720 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729183603652
- tweetId - 1846920335179870556
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN, it seems very likely that this is indeed Sinwar.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-17 11:54:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-17 11:52:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-17 11:58:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-17 11:57:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-17 11:53:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-17 11:49:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-17 11:48:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-17 11:53:05 -0500 | Rating Details |