Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-17 04:25:31 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Une méta-analyse portant sur 561 études scientifiques relatives à la décroissance indique que peu adoptent une perspective systémique, se limitant souvent à des cas locaux. Par ailleurs, près de 90 % des travaux analysés relèvent plus de l'opinion que de l'analyse. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002210

Written by 116710FDD431159BA7A665FDB503E2EBC8BCA8D3FDE83CC2273AA617A8A66539
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1846618250458575182

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1846769484620517754
  • noteId - 1846769484620517754
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 116710FDD431159BA7A665FDB503E2EBC8BCA8D3FDE83CC2273AA617A8A66539 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1729139131109
  • tweetId - 1846618250458575182
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Une méta-analyse portant sur 561 études scientifiques relatives à la décroissance indique que peu adoptent une perspective systémique, se limitant souvent à des cas locaux. Par ailleurs, près de 90 % des travaux analysés relèvent plus de l'opinion que de l'analyse. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002210

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-10-18 01:39:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-18 00:49:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 22:24:21 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 17:50:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 05:26:52 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 03:47:11 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 03:13:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 02:18:27 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 01:24:32 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 01:12:24 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 00:52:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 00:37:11 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-16 23:31:26 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-18 15:40:26 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 22:43:40 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 11:11:06 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 07:56:48 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 07:54:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 04:29:58 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 03:13:10 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 00:51:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 12:08:26 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 06:53:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 06:29:59 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 05:37:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 02:05:26 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 00:23:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-16 23:51:54 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 14:43:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 08:50:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 08:40:20 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 04:11:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 01:53:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 01:08:16 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 00:55:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-16 23:36:00 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 07:13:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 02:41:03 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 01:53:23 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 01:51:46 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 01:12:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 01:10:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-17 00:37:39 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-16 23:59:08 -0500 Rating Details