Birdwatch Note
2024-10-16 22:43:19 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. Un tweet de una persona involucrada en el hecho NO ES UNA FUENTE OBJETIVA. Esta persona debería ser removida para hacer notas de la comunidad
Written by C19FFBC8D4A44A78D6CAF45EE39C1E6EF5F479B8F244E7A53D7E808B0BAF0AA4
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1846566870083641537
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1846683369683169578
- noteId - 1846683369683169578
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C19FFBC8D4A44A78D6CAF45EE39C1E6EF5F479B8F244E7A53D7E808B0BAF0AA4 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729118599707
- tweetId - 1846566870083641537
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. Un tweet de una persona involucrada en el hecho NO ES UNA FUENTE OBJETIVA. Esta persona debería ser removida para hacer notas de la comunidad
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-10-18 08:36:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-16 18:23:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-18 07:03:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-17 20:21:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-16 19:43:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-17 22:43:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-16 21:32:32 -0500 | Rating Details |