Birdwatch Note
2024-10-16 10:29:25 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Nope. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Walz
Written by FF8C540C1646217BE301C1F4FCDD5A2667C8CB12D0089FDD573E1993D87FB331
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1846271674913890502
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1846498678627827850
- noteId - 1846498678627827850
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - FF8C540C1646217BE301C1F4FCDD5A2667C8CB12D0089FDD573E1993D87FB331 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729074565928
- tweetId - 1846271674913890502
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Nope. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Walz
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-16 10:36:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-16 10:17:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-16 09:13:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-16 08:18:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-16 13:16:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-16 09:08:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-16 11:54:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-16 06:35:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-16 05:38:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-16 05:37:44 -0500 | Rating Details |